<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can a company manufacture focus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/07/10/can-a-company-build-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/07/10/can-a-company-build-focus/</link>
	<description>Naked NYC&#039;s Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/07/10/can-a-company-build-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houseofnaked.com/?p=29249#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>Great post. I think one of the best things this does for Apple (or any company) is enable it to be utterly unapologetic. 

&quot;Why is your laptop so much?&quot;
&quot;We only build good products. Building good products is expensive.&quot;
&quot;Why do you stop supporting old operating systems?
&quot;Good products have clean code. Backwards compatibility dirties the code up.&quot;

Contrast this with Microsoft, which tries to be everything to everybody and fails across the board. You can list their products and services, but there&#039;s no way to articulate their mission in a sentance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I think one of the best things this does for Apple (or any company) is enable it to be utterly unapologetic. </p>
<p>&#8220;Why is your laptop so much?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;We only build good products. Building good products is expensive.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Why do you stop supporting old operating systems?<br />
&#8220;Good products have clean code. Backwards compatibility dirties the code up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Contrast this with Microsoft, which tries to be everything to everybody and fails across the board. You can list their products and services, but there&#8217;s no way to articulate their mission in a sentance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
