<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There is a better way:  You&#8217;re no one unless you&#8217;re talked about.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/06/25/there-is-a-better-way-youre-no-one-unless-youre-talked-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/06/25/there-is-a-better-way-youre-no-one-unless-youre-talked-about/</link>
	<description>Naked NYC&#039;s Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Totally Naked</title>
		<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/06/25/there-is-a-better-way-youre-no-one-unless-youre-talked-about/comment-page-1/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Totally Naked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houseofnaked.com/?p=28837#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DILUTION OR IMMORTALITY?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Obviously, Chanel thinks being mentioned in this way is diluting their brand, but in fact, when fashion editors say a cardigan is “Chanel-esque”, they’re building the Chanel brand, not the copycat’s. They’re building aspiration and desire. And let’s fa...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DILUTION OR IMMORTALITY?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Obviously, Chanel thinks being mentioned in this way is diluting their brand, but in fact, when fashion editors say a cardigan is “Chanel-esque”, they’re building the Chanel brand, not the copycat’s. They’re building aspiration and desire. And let’s fa&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/06/25/there-is-a-better-way-youre-no-one-unless-youre-talked-about/comment-page-1/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houseofnaked.com/?p=28837#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>I believe it was last Monday&#039;s WWD, Monday June 15. On the back cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was last Monday&#8217;s WWD, Monday June 15. On the back cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawne</title>
		<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/06/25/there-is-a-better-way-youre-no-one-unless-youre-talked-about/comment-page-1/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houseofnaked.com/?p=28837#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>Which issue of WWD was this in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which issue of WWD was this in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/06/25/there-is-a-better-way-youre-no-one-unless-youre-talked-about/comment-page-1/#comment-3261</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houseofnaked.com/?p=28837#comment-3261</guid>
		<description>I could see them going after bag counterfeiters, and stuff like that - doing raids, etc.  I can also see them taking down websites and ebay listings that use their name to sell fake goods.  BUT.  This is in WWD.  To fashion editors that aren&#039;t using their name to sell fake goods, in all likelihood.  So, unless they thing counterfeiters also read WWD, and will heed their warnings, I&#039;m not really sure how this helps them.  Not that I know that much about trademark issues, or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see them going after bag counterfeiters, and stuff like that &#8211; doing raids, etc.  I can also see them taking down websites and ebay listings that use their name to sell fake goods.  BUT.  This is in WWD.  To fashion editors that aren&#8217;t using their name to sell fake goods, in all likelihood.  So, unless they thing counterfeiters also read WWD, and will heed their warnings, I&#8217;m not really sure how this helps them.  Not that I know that much about trademark issues, or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pak</title>
		<link>http://www.houseofnaked.com/2009/06/25/there-is-a-better-way-youre-no-one-unless-youre-talked-about/comment-page-1/#comment-3259</link>
		<dc:creator>pak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houseofnaked.com/?p=28837#comment-3259</guid>
		<description>Fascinating.  And hmm, I wonder if their lawyers made them run this ad, so they can say they are publicly defending their trademark?  Because if you can&#039;t say you are defending a trademark, then aren&#039;t you more legally vulnerable to infringers and other &quot;well-intentioned mis-users&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating.  And hmm, I wonder if their lawyers made them run this ad, so they can say they are publicly defending their trademark?  Because if you can&#8217;t say you are defending a trademark, then aren&#8217;t you more legally vulnerable to infringers and other &#8220;well-intentioned mis-users&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
